·  LMS  ·  GWR  ·  LNER  ·  Misc  ·  Stations  ·  What's New  ·  Video  ·  Guestbook  ·  About

LMS Route: Nuneaton to Coventry

Foleshill Station: lnwrf135

LMS 3P 2-6-2T No 109 passes Foleshill goods yard whilst at the head of a four coach Nuneaton to Coventry local passenger service

LMS 3P 2-6-2T No 109 passes Foleshill goods yard whilst at the head of a four coach Nuneaton to Coventry local passenger service as an unidentified ex-LNWR 0-6-0 shunts in the yard circa 1948. At the rear of the train Foleshill station's good shed can be seen. Built at Derby works in July 1935, and despite the poor reputation of this class of locomotives for steaming, No 109 remained in service until July 1962 when it was withdrawn from Blackpool Central shed to be scrapped by Campbells of Shieldhall in May 1963. This class of locomotives were designed by William Stanier, later Sir William Stanier, and were based on the earlier 1930 design by Henry Fowler. The general dimensions were the same as Fowler's version but with some improvements to the chassis and a tapered boiler. They were under-boilered and although subsequently improved they were always considered to be indifferent performers and considered by some as inferior to their predecessors. The cab was of Stanier’s usual excellent design with the coal bunker built higher than the rear cab windows but angled inwards to provide excellent vision when running bunker first. The first two lots of locomotives, No 71 and No 144, were built with the Standard LMS No 6 domeless boiler but the remainder of the class were built with the improved 6A boilers with separate top-feed and steam dome. Both types of boilers were later modified to carry Adams ‘Vortex’ blastpipe in an attempt to improve steaming. Locomotives fitted with the later 6A boiler could always be identified by the larger diameter chimney. In a final attempt to improve the locomotives, six were rebuilt with the larger 6B boilers; these were No 169 in 1940, No 163 in 1941, No 148 and No 203 in 1941, and No 40142 and No 40167 in 1956. The re-boilering was not considered to be cost effective.

back